Peer Review Policy

PJBMR adheres to a double-blind peer review process, which is central to ensuring academic rigor and quality control. Under this system, the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process to eliminate bias and protect the integrity of evaluation. Each submitted manuscript is reviewed by at least two qualified, independent experts with domain-specific expertise relevant to the content of the manuscript.

Reviewers are expected to provide objective, timely, and constructive critiques that assist authors in improving the clarity, methodology, and scientific soundness of their work. The journal provides reviewers with clear guidance on evaluation criteria, including novelty, scientific relevance, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and compliance with ethical standards. Reviewers are also expected to declare any conflict of interest and recuse themselves if necessary.

PJBMR maintains a strict policy against coercive citation, inappropriate reviewer behavior, or any attempts to influence the publication process unduly. The editorial office monitors reviewer performance regularly and updates the reviewer pool to ensure diversity and academic excellence. Peer review timelines, reviewer expectations, and ethical standards are published on the journal’s website for transparency and public reference.